LabourFlowOSContract labour bill verification
SAMPLE DATA - DEMONSTRATION ONLY. No files of yours were used to produce this result.

Contractor Bill Verification Needs your review

Contractor claimed
Rs.1,15,605.00
LabourFlowOS verified
Rs.1,15,605.00
Variance identified
Rs.0.00
Lines needing attention
3 of 7
What does this mean? LabourFlowOS found Rs.0.00 of difference between the contractor's claim and what the attendance and rate information support. This is a variance identified by comparing the two, not an accusation - each item below shows exactly why it was flagged and what evidence it's based on.

Needs your review. We need you to confirm one or two things before the verified amount is final.

What we understood about your files

Bill

From "Skilled"

Column in your fileWhat we think it isConfidence
" employee code "Worker IDHigh confidence
"EMP NAME"Worker nameHigh confidence
"mandays"Contractor's claimed daysHigh confidence
"Basic Rate"Daily rateHigh confidence
"ot hrs"Overtime hours claimedHigh confidence
"OT Rate"Overtime rateHigh confidence
"Gross "Total amount claimedHigh confidence

From "Unskilled"

Column in your fileWhat we think it isConfidence
" employee code "Worker IDHigh confidence
"EMP NAME"Worker nameHigh confidence
"mandays"Contractor's claimed daysHigh confidence
"Basic Rate"Daily rateHigh confidence
"ot hrs"Overtime hours claimedHigh confidence
"OT Rate"Overtime rateHigh confidence
"Gross "Total amount claimedHigh confidence

Attendance

From "Sheet1"

Column in your fileWhat we think it isConfidence
"Worker"Worker nameHigh confidence
"01-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"02-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"03-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"04-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"05-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"06-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"07-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"08-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"09-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"10-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"11-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"12-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"13-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"14-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"15-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"16-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"17-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"18-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"19-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"20-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"21-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"22-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"23-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"24-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"25-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"26-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"27-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"28-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"29-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"30-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-
"31-Aug"Not used - we didn't recognize this column-

We may have found the same worker under two different ID/name formats

On the bill: "DINESH VARMA" (no ID given)

In attendance / our records: "Dinesh Verma" (ID: SBM-105)

Similarity: 92% · Amount at stake: Rs.10,560.00

Are these the same worker?

Line-by-line - why was this flagged?

MAHESH SINGH (SBM-103) CONFIRMED

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2525
Overtime hours55
AmountRs.21,125.00Rs.21,125.00
No discrepancy - claim matches the evidence.

GANESH NAIR (SBM-104) CONFIRMED

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2626
Overtime hours00
AmountRs.20,280.00Rs.20,280.00
No discrepancy - claim matches the evidence.

RAMESH KUMAR (SBM-101) CONFIRMED

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2626
Overtime hours88
AmountRs.18,240.00Rs.18,240.00
Billed more than once (financial impact: Rs.18,240.00)
Worker RAMESH KUMAR (SBM-101) is billed for the same period (2026-08-01 to 2026-08-31) in 2 separate bill line(s): SAMPLE-d2db6f5e5f41f0147f4cd5351d4e4052-L0003, SAMPLE-d2db6f5e5f41f0147f4cd5351d4e4052-L0007.

SURESH YADAV (SBM-102) CONFIRMED

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2424
Overtime hours00
AmountRs.13,440.00Rs.13,440.00
No discrepancy - claim matches the evidence.

DINESH VARMA (no ID given) Needs your review

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2222
Overtime hours00
AmountRs.10,560.00Rs.10,560.00
Worker identity needs your confirmation - see above. Nothing will be auto-adjusted for this line until you confirm.

RAJESH SHARMA (SBM-106) CONFIRMED

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2020
Overtime hours33
AmountRs.13,720.00Rs.13,720.00
No discrepancy - claim matches the evidence.

RAMESH KUMAR (SBM-101) CONFIRMED

Contractor claimedAttendance/rate supports
Days2626
Overtime hours88
AmountRs.18,240.00Rs.18,240.00
Billed more than once (financial impact: Rs.18,240.00)
Worker RAMESH KUMAR (SBM-101) is billed for the same period (2026-08-01 to 2026-08-31) in 2 separate bill line(s): SAMPLE-d2db6f5e5f41f0147f4cd5351d4e4052-L0003, SAMPLE-d2db6f5e5f41f0147f4cd5351d4e4052-L0007.

Download Verification Report

 

Ready to test your own contractor bill?

Audit My Own Files


This is a self-guided pilot demo. Files you upload are processed only to produce your result and are never shared with anyone else who visits this page. See how your data is handled.

© 2026 VORTEXCONES LLP. All rights reserved.